Keyword summary
18% 1 analyzed article/video 811 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sheldon Starr results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Authority , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 6.8% saturation with 166 hits . Analysis detected 1,120 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,433 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 19% (30,487 of 37,536 keywords). This Sheldon Starr is better (less manipulative) than 81.20% of the peer group. Sheldon Starr
Keyword details
Total words: 2,433
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
19% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 18.8% percentile 1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.2% 6.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.1% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.8% Composition/Division: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.2% Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst