Keyword summary
⁠48%1 analyzed article/video1,850 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sheep In The Box results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 8.6% saturation with 478 hits. Analysis detected 3,363 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,550 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠23% (28,951 of 37,536 keywords). This Sheep In The Box is better (less manipulative) than 77.10% of the peer group.
Sheep In The Box
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠23%Sheep In The Box (selected)2%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 5,550
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

23% percentile
025507510022.9% percentile
2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 4.7%4.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.5%4.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.2%4.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.1%0.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.7%3.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 5.2%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos