Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Shark Powerdetect Speed Clean Pet Pro Cordless Vacuum Review results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 9.1% saturation with 628 hits. Analysis detected 6,139 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,916 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Shark Powerdetect Speed Clean Pet Pro Cordless Vacuum Review is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Shark Powerdetect Speed Clean Pet Pro Cordless Vacuum Review
Keyword details
Total words: 6,916
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.8%6.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 6.6%6.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 9.1%9.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 7.9%7.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.9%1.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 7.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 0.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 3.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos