Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Shark Attack results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , Halo Effect , and Indoctrination , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 8.5% saturation with 334 hits . Analysis detected 2,541 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,913 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,533 keywords). This Shark Attack is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Shark Attack
Keyword details
Total words: 3,913
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 6.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.7% Indoctrination: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 0.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.4% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst