Keyword summary
13%1 analyzed article/video1,070 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sham Candidate results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Emotion, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.4% saturation with 367 hits. Analysis detected 1,497 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,210 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 26% (27,988 of 37,536 keywords). This Sham Candidate is better (less manipulative) than 74.60% of the peer group.
Sham Candidate
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
26%Sham Candidate (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,210
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

25% percentile
025507510025.4% percentile
2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 11.4%11.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 4.4%4.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.7%4.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 0.3%0.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 11.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.4%Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.4%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.1%Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate