Keyword summary
24%1 analyzed article/video973 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Shakespeare In Clark Park results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Overconfidence Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 5.9% saturation with 173 hits. Analysis detected 1,414 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,919 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 20% (30,202 of 37,536 keywords). This Shakespeare In Clark Park is better (less manipulative) than 80.50% of the peer group.
Shakespeare In Clark Park
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 2,919
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

20% percentile
025507510019.5% percentile
1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.9%2.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.3%1.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Keyword 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.0%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos