Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 904 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Senator Cervantes results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias , Confirmation Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 7.7% saturation with 278 hits . Analysis detected 2,755 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,616 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 52% (18,273 of 37,536 keywords). This Senator Cervantes is worse (more manipulative) than 51.30% of the peer group. Senator Cervantes
Keyword details
Total words: 3,616
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
51% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 51.3% percentile 2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.7% 7.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.4% 5.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 5.4% 5.4% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 6.9% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 0.8% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.1% Burden of Proof: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.0% Primacy Effect: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.5% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.1% Appeal to Nature: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst