Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Senate Select Committee On Intelligence results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Politically Left Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 22% saturation with 627 hits . Analysis detected 3,722 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,856 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 35,675 keywords). This Senate Select Committee On Intelligence is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Senate Select Committee On Intelligence
Keyword details
Total words: 2,856
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Keyword 21.9% 21.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 14.8% 14.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Keyword 9.9% 9.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Horn Effect Sitewide 1.0% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 14.8%, sitewide 26.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 21.9%, sitewide 2.0% Negativity Bias: Keyword 17.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 13.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 11.1% Begging the Question: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 1.7% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 5.3% Ad Hominem: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 2.2% Horn Effect: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 1.0% Slippery Slope: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.1% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst