Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video426 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Senate Homeland Security And Governmental Affairs Committee results contain 14 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Emotion, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 46.6% saturation with 595 hits. Analysis detected 1,786 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,278 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 10% and a BS Rank of ⁠95% (1,961 of 37,536 keywords). This Senate Homeland Security And Governmental Affairs Committee is worse (more manipulative) than 94.80% of the peer group.
Senate Homeland Security And Governmental Affairs Committee
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠95%Senate Homeland Security And Governmental Affairs Committee (selected)10%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,278
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

95% percentile
025507510094.8% percentile
10.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 28.9%28.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 46.6%46.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 12.4%12.4%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Keyword 5.8%5.8%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 6.8%6.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Horn EffectSitewide 1.0%Keyword 3.9%3.9%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 17.0%17.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 46.6%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 28.9%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 17.0%, sitewide 15.9%In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 6.9%Ad Hominem: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 2.2%Red Herring: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 0.7%Horn Effect: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 1.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.5%Loss Aversion: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 2.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.4%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos