Keyword summary
⁠82%1 analyzed article/video562 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Senate Committee On Health Education Labor Pensions results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Politically Right Leaning Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 23.2% saturation with 521 hits. Analysis detected 3,614 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,248 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠91% (5,142 of 56,518 keywords). This Senate Committee On Health Education Labor Pensions is worse (more manipulative) than 90.90% of the peer group.
Senate Committee On Health Education Labor Pensions
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 2,248
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

91% percentile
025507510090.9% percentile
6.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 16.7%16.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Keyword 8.8%8.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 6.9%6.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 23.2%23.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 11.8%11.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Keyword 5.9%5.9%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Keyword 4.6%4.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 23.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 19.2%, sitewide 19.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 16.7%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 14.7%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 11.8%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 9.1%Slippery Slope: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 1.7%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 7.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 0.8%In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 6.9%Loss Aversion: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 2.5%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 1.5%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.7%Straw Man: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.9%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos