Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video552 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Senate Campaign Suspension results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 22.3% saturation with 493 hits. Analysis detected 3,599 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,208 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠80% (7,644 of 37,536 keywords). This Senate Campaign Suspension is worse (more manipulative) than 79.60% of the peer group.
Senate Campaign Suspension
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 2,208
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

80% percentile
025507510079.6% percentile
4.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 19.5%19.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 19.1%19.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 14.4%14.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.2%1.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 7.8%7.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 6.5%6.5%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 5.8%5.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 14.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 22.3%, sitewide 19.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 19.5%, sitewide 1.4%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 19.1%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 12.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 3.7%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 8.1%Indoctrination: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 0.0%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 6.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 0.8%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 0.5%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 5.2%False Dilemma: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 1.5%Burden of Proof: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 0.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos