Keyword summary
31% 1 analyzed article/video 1,972 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Senate Bill 21 results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.8% saturation with 613 hits . Analysis detected 4,678 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,888 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 25% (43,574 of 57,542 keywords). This Senate Bill 21 is better (less manipulative) than 75.70% of the peer group. Senate Bill 21
Keyword details
Total words: 7,888
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
24% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 24.3% percentile 1.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.8% 7.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.2% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Burden of Proof: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.4% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.5% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst