Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video725 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Senate Bill 132 results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Politically Right Leaning Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 26.7% saturation with 1,160 hits. Analysis detected 5,926 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,350 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠80% (7,827 of 37,536 keywords). This Senate Bill 132 is worse (more manipulative) than 79.20% of the peer group.
Senate Bill 132
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠80%Senate Bill 132 (selected)5%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,350
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

79% percentile
025507510079.2% percentile
4.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 17.6%17.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 11.6%11.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Keyword 6.0%6.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.5%4.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.8%3.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 3.5%3.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 26.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 18.0%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 17.6%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.9%Straw Man: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 0.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Begging the Question: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 1.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 3.1%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Indoctrination: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 2.0%Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos