Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 549 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Senate Appropriations results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Optimism Bias , with Recency Bias as the most egregious example at 8.9% saturation with 146 hits . Analysis detected 1,059 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,647 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 61% (14,643 of 37,536 keywords). This Senate Appropriations is worse (more manipulative) than 61.00% of the peer group. Senate Appropriations
Keyword details
Total words: 1,647
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
61% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 61.0% percentile 3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.5% 7.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.3% 8.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 8.9% 8.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 19.2% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Recency Bias: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 2.7% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 4.0% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 1.1% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Horn Effect: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.0% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst