Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,303 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sen Rand Pau results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Politically Right Leaning Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 25.3% saturation with 1,317 hits. Analysis detected 9,282 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,212 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.8% and a BS Rank of 79% (8,011 of 37,536 keywords). This Sen Rand Pau is worse (more manipulative) than 78.70% of the peer group.
Sen Rand Pau
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
79%Sen Rand Pau (selected)5%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 5,212
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

79% percentile
025507510078.7% percentile
4.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.5%4.5%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 17.0%17.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 20.4%20.4%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 13.2%13.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 15.2%15.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 6.7%6.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.6%4.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 25.3%25.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 25.3%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 20.4%, sitewide 5.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 17.0%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 14.1%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 15.2%, sitewide 8.1%Ad Hominem: Keyword 13.2%, sitewide 2.2%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 12.5%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Indoctrination: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 0.0%Horn Effect: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 1.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 3.1%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Begging the Question: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.7%Straw Man: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos