Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,462 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sen Addison Mitchell Mcconnell results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.3% saturation with 719 hits. Analysis detected 4,626 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,848 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠30% (26,572 of 37,536 keywords). This Sen Addison Mitchell Mcconnell is better (less manipulative) than 70.80% of the peer group.
Sen Addison Mitchell Mcconnell
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 5,848
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

29% percentile
025507510029.2% percentile
2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 7.1%7.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 12.3%12.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.4%0.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 10.6%10.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 6.8%6.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 10.6%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos