Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video559 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Self Defense Strikes results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Anchoring Bias, and Fundamental Attribution Error, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.2% saturation with 228 hits. Analysis detected 1,560 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,236 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠46% (20,589 of 37,536 keywords). This Self Defense Strikes is better (less manipulative) than 54.90% of the peer group.
Self Defense Strikes
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠46%Self Defense Strikes (selected)3%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,236
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

45% percentile
025507510045.1% percentile
2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 10.2%10.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Sunk Cost EffectSitewide 0.3%Keyword 3.5%3.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 10.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 4.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 4.6%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 2.2%Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 0.3%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.5%Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.6%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.4%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.7%Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.4%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos