Keyword summary
95% 1 analyzed article/video 834 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Secretaries Of State results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Begging the Question , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 25.5% saturation with 638 hits . Analysis detected 4,138 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,502 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.3% and a BS Rank of 82% (6,256 of 34,692 keywords). This Secretaries Of State is worse (more manipulative) than 82.00% of the peer group. Secretaries Of State
Keyword details
Total words: 2,502
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
82% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 82.0% percentile 5.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 24.5% 24.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.9% 9.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Keyword 12.1% 12.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 25.5% 25.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.5% 5.5% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 8.0% 8.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 5.4% 5.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 10.9% 10.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 25.5%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 24.5%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 15.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 12.1%, sitewide 1.7% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 12.1%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 11.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 10.9%, sitewide 6.9% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 2.7% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 7.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 0.8% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 4.6% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 2.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 2.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.1% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.4% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 2.2% Bandwagon: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.2% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst