Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video2,272 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Secret Rulings results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18% saturation with 1,632 hits. Analysis detected 8,415 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,088 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 39% (23,004 of 37,536 keywords). This Secret Rulings is better (less manipulative) than 61.30% of the peer group.
Secret Rulings
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
39%Secret Rulings (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 9,088
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

39% percentile
025507510038.7% percentile
2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles9.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 10.7%10.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 6.6%6.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.2%0.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.2%2.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 10.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 18.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.1%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos