Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,113 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sebastien Lecornu results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Availability Heuristic, and Unattributed Quote, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.3% saturation with 671 hits. Analysis detected 3,062 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,960 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 27% (27,644 of 37,536 keywords). This Sebastien Lecornu is better (less manipulative) than 73.60% of the peer group.
Sebastien Lecornu
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
27%Sebastien Lecornu (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 5,960
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

26% percentile
025507510026.4% percentile
2.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 11.3%11.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.6%0.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.5%4.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.5%1.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 4.0%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos