Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Seattle University results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 7.6% saturation with 267 hits. Analysis detected 2,110 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,500 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Seattle University is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Seattle University
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
0%Seattle University (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,500
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 7.5%7.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 5.7%5.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 7.6%7.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.0%1.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 6.3%6.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Keyword 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Red Herring: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.2%Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.4%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Indoctrination: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.0%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.4%Primacy Effect: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos