Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,492 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Seattle Economy results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Pessimism Bias , and Anecdotal , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.2% saturation with 777 hits . Analysis detected 5,042 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,871 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 30% (26,454 of 37,536 keywords). This Seattle Economy is better (less manipulative) than 70.50% of the peer group. Seattle Economy
Keyword details
Total words: 5,871
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
30% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 29.5% percentile 2.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 13.2% 13.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 6.3% 6.3% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Keyword 6.2% 6.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 13.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 6.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 1.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 5.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% False Dilemma: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 1.5% Loss Aversion: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 2.5% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 3.3% Slippery Slope: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.8% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst