Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 429 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Seattle Development results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Self-Serving Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 15.7% saturation with 270 hits . Analysis detected 1,513 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,716 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 57% (16,302 of 37,536 keywords). This Seattle Development is worse (more manipulative) than 56.60% of the peer group. Seattle Development
Keyword details
Total words: 1,716
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
57% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 56.6% percentile 3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 8.9% 8.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 15.7% 15.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 8.2% 8.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 15.7%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 3.7% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 4.6% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 2.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 3.3% Begging the Question: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.0% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.1% Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst