Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video429 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Seattle Development results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Self-Serving Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 15.7% saturation with 270 hits. Analysis detected 1,513 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,716 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 57% (16,302 of 37,536 keywords). This Seattle Development is worse (more manipulative) than 56.60% of the peer group.
Seattle Development
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
57%Seattle Development (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,716
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

57% percentile
025507510056.6% percentile
3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 8.9%8.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 15.7%15.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.8%2.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 8.2%8.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 4.3%4.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 15.7%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 3.7%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 4.6%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 2.2%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 3.3%Begging the Question: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.0%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.1%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos