Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,258 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Scott Roecker results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Pessimism Bias , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 15.6% saturation with 785 hits . Analysis detected 3,354 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,032 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 43% (21,725 of 37,536 keywords). This Scott Roecker is better (less manipulative) than 57.90% of the peer group. Scott Roecker
Keyword details
Total words: 5,032
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
42% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 42.1% percentile 2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.7% 7.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.8% 6.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 15.6% 15.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Keyword 5.2% 5.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 15.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 1.9% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.8% Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst