Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,414 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Scott Fitzpatrick results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Anchoring Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 25.4% saturation with 1,438 hits . Analysis detected 4,369 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,656 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 40% (20,937 of 34,832 keywords). This Scott Fitzpatrick is better (less manipulative) than 60.10% of the peer group. Scott Fitzpatrick
Keyword details
Total words: 5,656
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
40% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 39.9% percentile 2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 25.4% 25.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 8.2% 8.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 25.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 9.1% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 4.0% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.7% Primacy Effect: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.9% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst