Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video76 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Science Talk Show results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Halo Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 28.3% saturation with 86 hits. Analysis detected 256 faulty-reasoning hits from 304 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 21.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠100% (336 of 37,536 keywords). This Science Talk Show is worse (more manipulative) than 99.10% of the peer group.
Science Talk Show
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠100%Science Talk Show (selected)22%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 304
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

99% percentile
025507510099.1% percentile
21.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles304 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 28.3%28.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 18.4%18.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 19.1%19.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 18.4%18.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 28.3%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Keyword 19.1%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 18.4%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Keyword 18.4%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos