Keyword summary
71% 1 analyzed article/video 2,206 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Science Policy results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Confirmation Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 21.9% saturation with 1,452 hits . Analysis detected 6,323 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,618 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 43% (21,563 of 37,536 keywords). This Science Policy is better (less manipulative) than 57.40% of the peer group. Science Policy
Keyword details
Total words: 6,618
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
43% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 42.6% percentile 2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 21.9% 21.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 14.4% 14.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Tu Quoque Sitewide 0.2% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 5% 5% 10% 10% 15% 15% 20% 20% 25% 25% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 21.9%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Keyword 14.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 8.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 5.2% Tu Quoque: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 0.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 2.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.2% Burden of Proof: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.4% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.4% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.9% Straw Man: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.9% Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst