Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,992 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Science Funding results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Emotion , with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 14.3% saturation with 1,137 hits . Analysis detected 10,068 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,968 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 50% (18,783 of 37,536 keywords). This Science Funding is worse (more manipulative) than 50.00% of the peer group. Science Funding
Keyword details
Total words: 7,968
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
50% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 50.0% percentile 2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 14.3% 14.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 14.2% 14.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 13.1% 13.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 14.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 12.2%, sitewide 15.9% Indoctrination: Keyword 14.3%, sitewide 0.0% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 13.1%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.0% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 1.9% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Slippery Slope: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 1.7% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst