Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,992 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Science Funding results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Emotion, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 14.3% saturation with 1,137 hits. Analysis detected 10,068 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,968 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 50% (18,783 of 37,536 keywords). This Science Funding is worse (more manipulative) than 50.00% of the peer group.
Science Funding
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
50%Science Funding (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 7,968
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

50% percentile
025507510050.0% percentile
2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.0%4.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 14.3%14.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.2%2.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 14.2%14.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 13.1%13.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.8%1.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.5%3.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 14.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 12.2%, sitewide 15.9%Indoctrination: Keyword 14.3%, sitewide 0.0%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 13.1%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.0%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 1.9%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.2%Slippery Slope: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 1.7%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos