Keyword summary
95%1 analyzed article/video347 analyzed words
BS Summary: These School Segregation results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias, Framing Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 51.4% saturation with 714 hits. Analysis detected 3,672 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,388 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8.5% and a BS Rank of 93% (2,649 of 37,534 keywords). This School Segregation is worse (more manipulative) than 92.90% of the peer group.
School Segregation
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
93%School Segregation (selected)9%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,388
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

93% percentile
025507510092.9% percentile
8.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 51.4%51.4%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Keyword 32.2%32.2%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Keyword 11.2%11.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.8%3.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 24.9%24.9%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 5.2%5.2%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Keyword 5.5%5.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.7%4.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 11.4%11.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 51.4%, sitewide 5.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 32.2%, sitewide 2.0%Framing Effect: Keyword 28.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 24.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 15.1%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 11.4%, sitewide 7.5%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 11.2%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 10.7%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.9%Ad Hominem: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 1.9%Burden of Proof: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 0.4%Anecdotal: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 5.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 4.0%Slippery Slope: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 0.8%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 1.4%Begging the Question: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos