Keyword summary
94%4 analyzed articles/videos1,042 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Scandals results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Confirmation Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 30.1% saturation with 3,150 hits. Analysis detected 18,077 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,448 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 68% (12,338 of 37,536 keywords). This Scandals is worse (more manipulative) than 67.10% of the peer group.
Scandals
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
68%Scandals (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

67% percentile
025507510067.1% percentile
3.8% BS Score4 analyzed articles10.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 30.1%30.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 7.9%7.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 28.6%28.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 8.1%8.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Tu QuoqueSitewide 0.2%Keyword 5.5%5.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 4.7%4.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.5%4.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 2.0%2.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 30.1%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Keyword 28.6%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.0%Tu Quoque: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 0.2%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 5.2%Indoctrination: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 1.1%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 2.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.9%Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 2.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateKeyword rate