Keyword summary
94% 4 analyzed articles/videos 1,042 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Scandals results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Confirmation Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 30.1% saturation with 3,150 hits . Analysis detected 18,077 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,448 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 68% (12,338 of 37,536 keywords). This Scandals is worse (more manipulative) than 67.10% of the peer group. Scandals
Keyword details
Total words: 10,448
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
67% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 67.1% percentile 3.8% BS Score4 analyzed articles10.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 30.1% 30.1% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.9% 7.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 28.6% 28.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 8.1% 8.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Tu Quoque Sitewide 0.2% Keyword 5.5% 5.5% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 30.1%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Keyword 28.6%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.0% Tu Quoque: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 0.2% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 5.2% Indoctrination: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 1.1% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 2.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.9% Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 2.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst