Keyword summary
47% 1 analyzed article/video 778 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Save Austin Now Pac results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.4% saturation with 267 hits . Analysis detected 1,292 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,334 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 38% (23,319 of 37,536 keywords). This Save Austin Now Pac is better (less manipulative) than 62.10% of the peer group. Save Austin Now Pac
Keyword details
Total words: 2,334
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
38% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 37.9% percentile 2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 11.4% 11.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.3% 6.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 11.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.3% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.0% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.1% Middle Ground: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 0.8% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst