Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video826 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Save America Pac results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 44.9% saturation with 1,484 hits. Analysis detected 5,937 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,304 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.4% and a BS Rank of 88% (4,589 of 37,533 keywords). This Save America Pac is worse (more manipulative) than 87.80% of the peer group.
Save America Pac
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
88%Save America Pac (selected)7%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,304
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

88% percentile
025507510087.8% percentile
6.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 44.9%44.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 33.9%33.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 16.9%16.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 8.2%8.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 8.4%8.4%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Keyword 8.4%8.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 8.0%8.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 44.9%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Keyword 33.9%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Keyword 16.9%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 2.0%Indoctrination: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 0.0%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 7.5%Ad Hominem: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 2.2%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Begging the Question: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos