Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,310 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sarah Rosalena results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Anecdotal, and Hasty Generalization, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 4.3% saturation with 224 hits. Analysis detected 2,090 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,240 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠8% (34,647 of 37,536 keywords). This Sarah Rosalena is better (less manipulative) than 92.30% of the peer group.
Sarah Rosalena
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠8%Sarah Rosalena (selected)2%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 5,240
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

8% percentile
02550751007.7% percentile
1.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.5%1.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Appeal to Nature: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.2%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos