Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,447 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sandringham results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 55.8% saturation with 2,422 hits . Analysis detected 7,157 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,341 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.3% and a BS Rank of 88% (4,715 of 37,536 keywords). This Sandringham is worse (more manipulative) than 87.40% of the peer group. Sandringham
Keyword details
Total words: 4,341
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
87% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 87.4% percentile 6.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 55.8% 55.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 30.7% 30.7% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Keyword 7.6% 7.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Red Herring Sitewide 0.7% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Framing Effect: Keyword 55.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 30.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 16.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 8.1% Slippery Slope: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 1.7% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Red Herring: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 0.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.1% Primacy Effect: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst