Keyword summary
â 41% 1 analyzed article/video 1,678 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sanders results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 14.8% saturation with 992 hits . Analysis detected 5,128 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,712 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of â 33% (25,158 of 37,536 keywords). This Sanders is better (less manipulative) than 67.00% of the peer group. Sanders
Keyword details
Total words: 6,712
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
33% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 33.0% percentile 2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 14.8% 14.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 13.9% 13.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 13.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 14.8%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.1% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst