Keyword summary
86% 1 analyzed article/video 374 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sand Hill Scout Reservation results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Unattributed Quote , and Negativity Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 15.5% saturation with 174 hits . Analysis detected 1,332 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,122 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.4% and a BS Rank of 83% (6,433 of 37,536 keywords). This Sand Hill Scout Reservation is worse (more manipulative) than 82.90% of the peer group. Sand Hill Scout Reservation
Keyword details
Total words: 1,122
Article count: 1
Authors
?
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
83% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 82.9% percentile 5.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 13.7% 13.7% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 13.0% 13.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Keyword 8.6% 8.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 12.7% 12.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 8.2% 8.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 13.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 15.5%, sitewide 15.9% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 13.0%, sitewide 1.1% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 9.1% Slippery Slope: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 1.7% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 4.0% In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Recency Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 2.5% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.0% Burden of Proof: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.4% Primacy Effect: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst