Keyword summary
82% 1 analyzed article/video 555 analyzed words
BS Summary: These San Francisco Port results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Primacy Effect , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 18.7% saturation with 311 hits . Analysis detected 1,579 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,665 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 61% (14,629 of 37,536 keywords). This San Francisco Port is worse (more manipulative) than 61.00% of the peer group. San Francisco Port
Keyword details
Total words: 1,665
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
61% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 61.0% percentile 3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 17.1% 17.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Primacy Effect Sitewide 0.9% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 18.7%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 17.1%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 3.3% Primacy Effect: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 0.9% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 3.7% Indoctrination: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 0.0% Red Herring: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Special Pleading: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.3% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.1% Blind-Spot Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst