Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 5,208 analyzed words
BS Summary: These San Francisco History results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Emotion , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 4.1% saturation with 854 hits . Analysis detected 7,245 faulty-reasoning hits from 20,832 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of 2% (36,912 of 37,536 keywords). This San Francisco History is better (less manipulative) than 98.30% of the peer group. San Francisco History
Keyword details
Total words: 20,832
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
2% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 1.7% percentile 1.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles20.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst