Keyword summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos505 analyzed words
BS Summary: These San Francisco District 11 results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Appeal to Emotion, and Halo Effect, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.4% saturation with 743 hits. Analysis detected 3,868 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,880 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠7% (34,981 of 37,536 keywords). This San Francisco District 11 is better (less manipulative) than 93.20% of the peer group.
San Francisco District 11
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 7,880
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

7% percentile
02550751006.8% percentile
1.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 9.4%9.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.9%3.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.3%1.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.7%2.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.0%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos