Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These San Bernardino National Forest results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Appeal to Emotion, and Availability Heuristic, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 5.7% saturation with 164 hits. Analysis detected 1,243 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,895 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This San Bernardino National Forest is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
San Bernardino National Forest
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
⁠0%San Bernardino National Forest (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,895
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.9%4.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 5.7%5.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.8%0.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.7%1.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 0.5%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Bandwagon: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.2%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.8%Indoctrination: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos