Keyword summary
69% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,691 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra 2 results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 18.3% saturation with 1,481 hits . Analysis detected 8,813 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,073 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 50% (18,777 of 37,536 keywords). This Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra 2 is worse (more manipulative) than 50.00% of the peer group. Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra 2
Keyword details
Total words: 8,073
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
50% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 50.0% percentile 2.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 18.4% 18.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 17.4% 17.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.4% 7.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 6.1% 6.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 5.2% 5.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 19.2% Optimism Bias: Keyword 18.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 17.4%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 6.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 0.8% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 5.2% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 1.1% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst