Keyword summary
83%1 analyzed article/video1,403 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Salt Soil And Supper results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Negativity Bias, with Politically Left Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 17.4% saturation with 734 hits. Analysis detected 5,045 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,209 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 59% (15,626 of 37,536 keywords). This Salt Soil And Supper is worse (more manipulative) than 58.40% of the peer group.
Salt Soil And Supper
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
59%Salt Soil And Supper (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,209
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

58% percentile
025507510058.4% percentile
3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 7.0%7.0%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Keyword 17.4%17.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 10.1%10.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 7.9%7.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.6%3.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 12.7%12.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 12.0%12.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 3.1%3.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.1%, sitewide 19.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 17.4%, sitewide 2.0%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 12.7%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 12.0%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.1%Indoctrination: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos