Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video559 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Safer Streets results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Confirmation Bias, and Framing Effect, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 8.6% saturation with 192 hits. Analysis detected 1,720 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,236 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 52% (18,022 of 37,536 keywords). This Safer Streets is worse (more manipulative) than 52.00% of the peer group.
Safer Streets
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
52%Safer Streets (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,236
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

52% percentile
025507510052.0% percentile
3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 5.1%5.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 4.8%4.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 8.6%8.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 7.9%7.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.9%3.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.9%1.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 3.3%3.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 0.8%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 8.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 3.3%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 4.0%Indoctrination: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.1%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.5%Circular Reasoning: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.1%Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos