Keyword summary
⁠87%1 analyzed article/video66 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Safeguarding Democracy Project results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Burden of Proof, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 42.4% saturation with 84 hits. Analysis detected 417 faulty-reasoning hits from 198 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 30.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠100% (107 of 37,536 keywords). This Safeguarding Democracy Project is worse (more manipulative) than 99.70% of the peer group.
Safeguarding Democracy Project
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 198
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

100% percentile
025507510099.7% percentile
30.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles198 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 42.4%42.4%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Keyword 28.3%28.3%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Keyword 28.3%28.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 42.4%42.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 42.4%42.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 14.1%14.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 12.6%12.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 42.4%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Keyword 42.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 42.4%, sitewide 19.2%Burden of Proof: Keyword 28.3%, sitewide 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 28.3%, sitewide 2.0%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 14.1%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 12.6%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos