Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 3,408 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Saaspocalypse results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Framing Effect , and Optimism Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.6% saturation with 1,306 hits . Analysis detected 9,472 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,632 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 16% (29,815 of 35,196 keywords). This Saaspocalypse is better (less manipulative) than 84.70% of the peer group. Saaspocalypse
Keyword details
Total words: 13,632
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
15% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 15.3% percentile 1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles13.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.4% 5.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 9.6% 9.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.4% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.1% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.8% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst