Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 849 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Saada results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Negativity Bias , and Burden of Proof , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 33.5% saturation with 1,110 hits . Analysis detected 6,619 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,310 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.4% and a BS Rank of 83% (6,419 of 37,536 keywords). This Saada is worse (more manipulative) than 82.90% of the peer group. Saada
Keyword details
Total words: 3,310
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
83% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 82.9% percentile 5.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 20.7% 20.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Keyword 11.2% 11.2% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 33.5% 33.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 10.4% 10.4% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 9.4% 9.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 33.5%, sitewide 26.9% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 20.7%, sitewide 7.5% Negativity Bias: Keyword 16.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 15.9% Burden of Proof: Keyword 11.2%, sitewide 0.4% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 11.1%, sitewide 9.1% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 11.1% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 10.4%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 3.3% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 8.1% Anecdotal: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 3.7% In-Group Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 4.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 0.8% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 1.1% Recency Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 2.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.1% Red Herring: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst