Keyword summary
75% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,624 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ruth Friedman results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Unattributed Quote , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 19.6% saturation with 1,272 hits . Analysis detected 5,292 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,496 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 63% (21,392 of 56,873 keywords). This Ruth Friedman is worse (more manipulative) than 62.40% of the peer group. Ruth Friedman
Keyword details
Total words: 6,496
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
62% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 62.4% percentile 2.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 13.5% 13.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 9.8% 9.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 13.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 19.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 11.1% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 1.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Slippery Slope: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 1.7% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.0% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst