Keyword summary
31%1 analyzed article/video528 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Russia Sanctions Bill results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Overconfidence Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 9.1% saturation with 193 hits. Analysis detected 1,283 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,112 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 48% (19,767 of 37,536 keywords). This Russia Sanctions Bill is better (less manipulative) than 52.70% of the peer group.
Russia Sanctions Bill
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
48%Russia Sanctions Bill (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,112
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

47% percentile
025507510047.3% percentile
2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.2%4.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 9.1%9.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.6%5.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 3.7%3.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 4.6%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.5%Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.8%Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos