Keyword summary
31% 1 analyzed article/video 528 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Russia Sanctions Bill results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Overconfidence Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 9.1% saturation with 193 hits . Analysis detected 1,283 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,112 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 48% (19,767 of 37,536 keywords). This Russia Sanctions Bill is better (less manipulative) than 52.70% of the peer group. Russia Sanctions Bill
Keyword details
Total words: 2,112
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
47% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 47.3% percentile 2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 9.1% 9.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.6% 5.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 8.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 6.0% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 6.7% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 4.6% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.1% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.0% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.5% Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.8% Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.3% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst