Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,113 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rupaul results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, In-Group Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.9% saturation with 397 hits. Analysis detected 3,184 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,452 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 42% (21,811 of 37,536 keywords). This Rupaul is better (less manipulative) than 58.10% of the peer group.
Rupaul
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
42%Rupaul (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,452
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

42% percentile
025507510041.9% percentile
2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.9%3.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 8.9%8.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.9%3.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 3.9%3.9%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 6.0%In-Group Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 5.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 0.5%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 2.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.4%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos