Keyword summary
96% 1 analyzed article/video 358 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rules Controversy results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Overconfidence Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 26.3% saturation with 282 hits . Analysis detected 1,554 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,074 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.6% and a BS Rank of 84% (6,033 of 37,536 keywords). This Rules Controversy is worse (more manipulative) than 83.90% of the peer group. Rules Controversy
Keyword details
Total words: 1,074
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
84% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 83.9% percentile 5.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 26.3% 26.3% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 9.0% 9.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 20.3% 20.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 10.3% 10.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 9.9% 9.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 5.5% 5.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 20.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 26.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 11.1% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 4.6% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 9.1% Ad Hominem: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 2.2% In-Group Bias: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 6.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 2.2% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 0.8% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 5.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 2.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% Primacy Effect: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.9% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.4% Begging the Question: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst