Keyword summary
96%1 analyzed article/video358 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rules Controversy results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Overconfidence Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 26.3% saturation with 282 hits. Analysis detected 1,554 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,074 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.6% and a BS Rank of 84% (6,033 of 37,536 keywords). This Rules Controversy is worse (more manipulative) than 83.90% of the peer group.
Rules Controversy
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
84%Rules Controversy (selected)6%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,074
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

84% percentile
025507510083.9% percentile
5.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 26.3%26.3%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 9.0%9.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 20.3%20.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 10.3%10.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 9.9%9.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.2%4.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 5.5%5.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 20.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 26.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 11.1%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 4.6%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 9.1%Ad Hominem: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 2.2%In-Group Bias: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 6.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 2.2%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 0.8%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 5.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 2.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.0%Primacy Effect: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.9%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.4%Begging the Question: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos